|
Quantitative EEG (QEEG)
began in the 1970s and early 80s as an attempt to
extract from brain electrical activity more than what
could be readily appreciated by simple, unaided visual
inspection of EEG. QEEG should be viewed as an extension
of, and not a replacement for, traditional EEG.
Clinically, QEEG should always follow the preparation
and analysis of the classic EEG. The human eye is still
superior to the computer in many aspects of brain signal
analysis. But the computer is superior to the eye and
mind for other aspects of analysis.
What are "brainmaps"?
To assist in the
estimation of EEG spectral content (one of the most
difficult tasks by visual inspection), EEG data are
entered into a computer, as for dEEG, and spectral
content is rigorously determined by the use of
techniques of mathematical signal analysis (typically by
the FFT or Fast Fourier Transform algorithm). One of the
early problems that was noted was how to visualize
results since QEEG typically uses more channels than
EEG. The solution was to map the results using colored
grey scaling on schematic maps of the head.To some, such
brain electrical activity mapping or simply "mapping" is
taken as synonymous with QEEG. However mapping is only a
display technique and only the first step. The heart of
QEEG lies with the underlying computerized analytic and
statistical techniques.
What else can
spectral analysis measure?
A special result of
spectral analysis is a measure of the coherence between
two electrodes. This is referred to as "spectral
coherence". It assesses the similarity of spectral
content of two electrodes over time and is usually taken
to reflect a measure of "coupling" between brain
regions. It is virtually impossible to estimate
coherence by visual EEG inspection. Some illnesses may
begin with abnormalities of cortical "coupling".
Leuchter has reported such abnormalities in Alzheimer's
Disease and Thatcher found abnormality of coherence as
the best discriminator of mild closed head injury.
How do you know
how abnormal a finding is?
Such spectral maps
provide excellent displays of the spatial distribution
of EEG spectral content and are clinically useful as
such. However, evidence has shown that in some way it
would be necessary to estimate when such data were
outside of normal bounds for a patients age. This lead
first to the need for and the development of normative
databases of brain electrical activity at all ages.
Second, it lead to the development of the technique of
mapping, not just a patient's brain activity, but also
the degree of statistical deviancy of the patient from
the normal database (in units of standard deviation of
scores). Such images of deviancy are referred to as
SPM (statistical or significance probability maps). Thus
a neurophysiologist may look at a SPM and locate regions
of possible clinical abnormality by deviant regions on
the SPM. The term "encephalopathic" often refers to
brains with excessive EEG slowing. A typical application
would be to determine whether behavioral disturbance in
an adult is due to early dementia (increased slowing) or
otherwise uncomplicated depression (no increase of
slowing). QEEG techniques add significant power to the
search for subtle encephalopathic change. Although
developed first for QEEGanalyses, the SPM technique has
been widely adapted for use with other neuroimaging
techniques.
Are there other
applications for QEEG?
Another area where QEEG
techniques have been applied is to the long latency
sensory evoked potentials. EEG represents the brain's
ambient, spontaneously ongoing electrical activity.
Evoked potentials (EPs) are the brain's transient
response to externally applied stimuli ?] such as light
flashes, auditory clicks, and mild electrical
shocks.These stimuli form, respectively, the visual
evoked response or potential (VEP), auditory EP (AEP)
and somatosensory EP (SEP). Since the BEG is much higher
amplitude than the EP, it is necessary to apply a
stimulus repetitively at random times and average the
result so as to effectively remove the random background
EEG and visualize the EP. This computerized technique is
often referred to as "signal averaging".
Classic Neurophysiology
employs a few EP channels and evaluates the short
latency response (e.g., under 30 msec). When obtained,
these signals are seen to arise from specific deep brain
structures and allow for assessment of structures within
the brain stem and thalamus. When longer latencies
(longer times from stimulation) are evaluated, signals
appear to be coming from the cortical mantle.
Unfortunately the complex waveform morphologies from a
large set of such long latency EPs can be very difficult
to analyze by unaided visual inspection. However, with
the use of normative databases and the SPM technique,
regions of clinically important abnormality can be
delineated within the complex combined spatialtemporal
information within long latency EP data sets. Many QEEG
laboratories incorporate the long latency EP along with
spectral analyzed EEG signals and traditional EEG as
part of their routine clinical studies. Such EP data
tend to be sensitive to clinical conditions where
cortical dysfunction is hypothesized (e.g., dyslexia,
schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease) although they are
also often found to be abnormal in epilepsy. |